Top 10 Weight Loss Foods That Will Keep You Feeling Full
Hello Health Champions today we're going to talk about the most satisfying foods that can help you
with weight loss so at the University of Sydney they had this brilliant idea to start a study and
find out which foods were the most satisfying because they had the idea that maybe not all
calories are the same maybe certain foods affect the body differently and if a food can keep you
full longer then you're going to eat less and it's going to help you lose weight over time and so far
I completely agree with that premise unfortunately it is very very difficult to do a study like that
and in my opinion they didn't do a really great job for starters they didn't have a really good
idea of what food is which we'll talk about in detail but anyway they started out with white
bread just to assign a food like like a basic number so they assigned white bread the number
100 and then all other Foods were expressed as a percentage of that so if it had a higher number
it was more satiating more satisfying than white bread so they found that popcorn for example had
154 so it was one and a half times as satisfying as white bread they found that porridge also known
as oatmeal was twice a satisfying as white bread they found that beef steak had 176 and a type of
fish known as ling fish had 225 and interestingly the winner in this entire experiment was potatoes
boiled potatoes not french fries or anything else but just boiled potatoes at 323 was more than
three times as satisfying as white bread and then also in the fruit category oranges was the most
satisfying at 202. now here's the problem as far as I could tell this was the only study of this
kind that they had performed which means there are no other studies to confirm or contradict it but
this has been quoted it's been referenced people have talked about this study hundreds of times and
I saw several videos where they said these are the foods this is how satisfying the foods are
as if this was an absolute truth now here are some of the big issues that I have with this study and
again I think it was a good initiative and it is very difficult to perform a study like this but
you also have to understand what you're dealing with so first of all the average age here was
22. we're talking about very young people who for the most part haven't developed any weight
problems yet the average BMI of these people was 23 and what does that mean well it means if
you're five foot two then you'd weigh 125 pounds in centimeters that's 157 centimeters and 56 kilos
this is a thin person if you're a little taller at 5.7 you'd weigh 148 pounds that's 170 centimeters
and 67 kilos or if you're as tall as I am six foot three you would weigh 185 pounds which is
190 centimeters or 84 kilos and this happens to be my BMI so these are people who do not need to
lose weight and yet the whole purpose of this was to study satiety to study people's eating
behaviors and hunger and responds to certain foods to help people lose weight and yet you
study people who don't need to lose weight so there's a huge mismatch right there the second
issue was that of course they have to feed these people a fixed amount of calories they gave them
a thousand kilojoules which is 240 kilocalories or in everyday speak we call it 240 calories and
that's not a whole lot of food that's more like a small snack than it is a full meal and it sort of
assumes that if you're eating that small amount of food then you would need to eat that type of meal
eight times per day so to study satiety behavior and assume that you're going to eat that often is
a little bit distorted also and then this test the way that they performed it was they gave
these people a certain amount of food and a glass of water and then they said don't rush but try
to finish within 10 minutes and then at every 15 minutes up till two hours they had them fill out
a questionnaire about how they felt and if they felt like eating something how full were they and
so on so they only measured up till two hours so again we're assuming that if people are awake for
16 hours then they would have to eat eight meals of that type every day now is that reasonable
is that how we want to study satiety and eating Behavior well I think that is not how we should
eat but again a lot of people think that we should have multiple small meals I think that encourages
eating the wrong type of food and overeating now here's perhaps the biggest problem in designing
a study like this they gave them mostly isolated Foods because if you want to study a particular
type of food then that's what you give a person to eat and yet that is not how we normally eat things
and if we mix Foods then that completely changes how it interacts with the body and it also limits
a lot of the foods that you can test so one of the best foods for satiety is something like leafy
green vegetables but you can't test that by itself because it would take 30 cups of leafy greens to
get up to 240 calories so they just said let's not test that at all and to continue on that issue
these were mostly isolated foods but for some reason they decided that cereals and porridge
or oatmeal was to be served with milk so who's to say what the response is from the cereal
versus the milk rice pasta and bread on the other hand was eaten plain they had nothing at all with
that except water now the steak when they served this they cooked it the night before and then they
reheated it in a microwave and served it to these people with nothing else with it and we'll come
back to this day because this was actually low fat so you have a dry piece of meat that's reheated
in a microwave now that is not something that I would ever eat that doesn't sound very satisfying
I would be desperate to get something to eat after I had forced that into myself but another food in
the high protein category was Lent but this time now they cooked it with a lot of other ingredients
so they cooked it with onion and garlic and olive oil and tomatoes and they spiced it with salt and
pepper so this was much more like a complete meal than most of the other things that they
served now the third issue has to do with their choices of food and they had 38 common foods as
they called it but 18 of these Foods had more than 70 percent of their calories from carbohydrate now
this just goes to show how warped our perception is of what food really is if we look more about
how our ancestors would eat like a Paleo type diet there were basically no Foods at all that
would have over 70 percent of their calories from carbohydrate because with our ancestors food you
have you eliminate all sugar all processed foods all grains and there's probably no foods that
would get up to that level and a full 27 Foods had more than 50 percent of their calories from
carbohydrate so the vast majority of them when I talk about food I usually talk about how fat
needs to be high and carbohydrate needs to be low but the combination is terrible because the
carbohydrates trigger insulin which is storage hormone and now that insulin is going to store
both the carbohydrate and the fat that you ate so high fat high carb is a terrible combination
and yet a full 33 out of 38 Foods had more than 81 percent of the calories from fat and carbohydrate
but what I also talk about is how the combination of high fat and protein with very low carb is
perfectly fine because it doesn't trigger insulin and it's very satisfying and yet there was exactly
zero foods like that in these 38. another issue I found was in how they classify these Foods so one
of the groups was called a high protein group and here's where I thought we're going to find
a lot of good Whole Foods this is probably where I would find most of my meals and yet one of the
items here was baked beans which had 66 percent of its calories from carbohydrate whereas meat
has zero calories from carbohydrate and it has massive amounts of added sugar 16 grams in one
serving of only 2 240 calories it's almost like half a can of Coca-Cola and yet they fit that with
the high protein group now when I talk about beef steak I'm talking about a juicy fatty steak that
has 15 to 20 percent of fat where the calories are twice as many from fat as it is from Protein
that's a good juicy steak like a rib eye but in this case they had all the visible fat removed
so we had a dry piece of leather basically with 4.8 percent fat and again it's so distorted that
we get to learn that these are the foods that we're supposed to eat next issue was in the snacks
and confectionary group so here we had the Mars bar which is candy with 36.7 grams of sugar in
it but also in this category was it yogurt now I don't consider this yogurt at all I do eat yogurt
on a regular basis I eat whole fat full fat plain yogurt I add some berries and some Stevia but here
they had 37.6 grams of sugar there was more sugar in the yogurt than in the Mars bar now in this
study they were smart enough to put that type of yogurt in the snacks and confectionery group but
hundreds of people have quoted and passed on this study and how many of those I wonder are
going to put the yogurt in with the dairy group and now we learn that Dairy and yogurt have these
characteristics that they found in the study based on the sugar bomb and we also need to be
aware of what are we comparing so in the snacks they also had jelly beans they served 88 grams
of jelly beans and they said that these have 5.3 grams of protein this sounded really strange to
me because as far as I know there's nothing in jelly beans that would have protein and when I
looked it up indeed there was Zero protein in jelly beans and they said that there should be
44.6 grams of sugar in that amount of jelly beans whereas everywhere I looked it was 71 grams so
obviously jelly beans are not food but we need to ask ourselves what are we comparing and if
they have a type of food in a study and they find a certain type of result does that in any
way compare to the food that you're gonna find and buy and consume now if I was to make a list
of healthy satisfying foods that would help you lose weight there would probably be zero brand
name products on that list and yet on this list 28 out of the 38 Foods were brand name products
they were processed in some way so basically you've probably heard that if you want real
food you shop the perimeter of the store where the meats and vegetables and eggs and so forth are and
that all the processed foods are in the aisles in the middle well they basically are picking
three quarters of all their foods from the middle aisles where the processed food is and it's just
one more example of how far we've strayed from the idea of what food is so here were some general
things that they found in the study they found that the higher the weight the more grams of a
certain food that it had within those 240 calories that they fed you the more satisfied people were
so basically the volume fill them up because that meant if it had more weight that meant it has less
fat less starch it had more fiber and more water so volume does fill you up no big surprise there
they also found that if something was higher in protein then it was also more satisfying
so again we kind of know that the protein is more satisfying it breaks down more
slowly so no big surprise but then they also found that the items that were high in fat
resulted in less satiety they were inversely related and this comes as a big surprise to the
people in the low carb Community people who eat a lot of fat and get very satisfied get very filled
so you wonder how does that fit well virtually all of the high fat products were also high in
sugar these were things like cake and donuts and cookies so it's the sugar that messes this up
like we talked about you can combine protein and fat and have a very healthy meal but you can't
combine fat with sugar or carbs because now you drive up the insulin and you unbalance the whole
system they also found that the more satisfying The Taste the more palatable that a food was
the less satisfying it was right and that does not mean that a juicy steak is not satisfying it meant
that in this experiment when they gave people isolated food like just cooked rice like just
dry bread a dry piece of steak that was reheated and low fat the tasty items were obviously the
cake and the donuts which are not going to be very satisfying another thing that's really important
to understand is that all of these results are subjective so when they do a study they ask
people how full are you how hungry are you how do you feel and depending on the person you're
gonna get a huge range and then these results these responses are averaged and they draw a
conclusion this is called statistics and the thing we want to understand is the statistics can never
predict the behavior of the individual so just because they found something doesn't mean that
it applies to you so for example with the potatoes they scored 323 plus minus 51 that's an enormous
range it wasn't plus minus three percent plus minus 51 percent so the scores there range from
158 to 487. same thing with this beef steak it was 176 plus minus 50 percent so those responses went
from 88 to 264. so if you look at this even though potatoes overall were almost scored twice as high
as beef steak there were some people who thought that the beefsteak was 264 which was higher than
some people who ate the potatoes so again the statistics can never predict the individual
response and perhaps the biggest factor of all in that regard is what have you trained your body to
consume are you carb adapted or carb dependent or are you fat adapted because if you are carb
dependent then those foods are going to be more satisfying now remember they only studied for
two hours they assumed that no one would ever go longer than two hours before they eat again so in
that sense carbohydrates would work very well and if you're not fat adapted and you eat fat
then it's not going to be very satisfying you're going to be looking for those carbohydrates so
I hope you can see how very questionable these results are even though it was an honest effort
the intentions behind it were all good I applaud that but realize how difficult it is and yet this
being the only study it has been reblogged and it's been talked about in hundreds of websites and
blogs and videos as the way it is and we just have to understand it was a relatively poor selection
of food it is almost impossible to study food and satiety in this way and yet that is what is
being repeated and stated as the truth so here are the real most satisfying Foods in my opinion and
again we're not supposed to eat every two hours we don't have to limit ourselves to 200 140 calories
in a food so when we eat food I believe the most important factor for it to be satisfying is that
it has a low insulin index that means it is mostly consisting of fat and protein that don't stimulate
insulin and if it doesn't have fat or protein then it needs to be something like a leafy green or a
non-starchy vegetable that has mostly water and fiber that also don't stimulate insulin and if you
select foods like that you can eat a lot of food without raising your blood sugar more than a few
points they level out your blood sugar beautifully and if you level out your blood sugar now you get
satisfied and you get full for a very long time so rather than measuring satiety every 15 minutes
after a meal and concluding the experiment after two hours I think that food should last you 6 to
12 hours we should easily be able to go through the night and not wake up hungry in the morning
we should be able to have a meal and go for most of the rest of the day without having to eat again
and also like I mentioned my list of healthy foods would probably have few or no brand names because
if it's a brand name then for the most part it's a processed food so I'm going to give you a list
of 10 examples these are not in concrete these are not an absolute truth some of you may find these
very satisfying and others not so much so this is a trial and error kind of thing avocado it's a
very low carb low glycemic high fat and high fiber fantastic food leafy greens they are virtually
free of calories so they're not very satisfying in themselves but they have a certain amount of
bulk so if you combine them with a healthy fat like olive oil and vinegar dressing now that can
become very satisfying and then of course you can add some protein or some seeds and nuts to it and
again we don't eat Foods in isolation for the most part same thing holds true for non-starchy
vegetables things like broccoli and cauliflower and asparagus and Brussels sprouts and so forth
they have slightly more calories but they're not all that satisfying by themselves until you add
a little bit of fat great foods that we do eat perhaps in isolation sometimes like a snack would
be nuts like pecans would be my favorite because it's widely available it is very high fat very low
carb other great nuts would be like Macadamia and walnuts I sometimes eat pecans by themselves but
for the most part I would put them on yogurt for example which would be whole plain yogurt perhaps
with some ground up flax and chia seeds another thing I often add to that yogurt would be pumpkin
seeds seeds and nuts are both high protein high fat and low carb almost without exception some
more examples of good satisfying Foods would be beef and chicken and fish and I would again
prefer to have those I recommend that all of these would be relatively high in fat because protein
by itself dry low-fat protein is not all that satisfying it's better than a lot of carbs but it
doesn't really become that balanced meal until you have a good amount of fat with it and it doesn't
become a problem unless you have of carbohydrates or sugar with it if you combine these meats with
some of the first items on the list the low carb vegetables now that's a very very satisfying meal
and some other examples would be things like cheese and also high fat Dairy and down there
we probably should include also eggs but you want to make sure that you eat the whole egg it's the
Nature's perfect package the egg with the yolk and the white when you eat the white it is much less
vastly less satisfying because it doesn't have nearly the food value now if you want to dig a
lot deeper and start understanding the body at a whole other level I've created a blood work course
and I've put some information down below if you want to check that out there are 15 hours or more
of recordings by now and there are nine modules all together for each module there's an overview
of a topic there is a discussion of lab ranges versus optimal ranges there is a question answers
mixed in to to the material and we conclude each module with several case studies real live cases
where you get to see it applied and we have to analyze it so you can understand it and apply
it to your blood work if you enjoyed this video you're going to love that one and if you truly
want to master Health by understanding how the body really works make sure you subscribe hit
that Bell and turn on all the notifications so you never miss a life-saving video