AMA #5: Intrusive Thoughts, CGMs, Behavioral Change, Naps & NSDR
ANDREW HUBERMAN: Welcome to the Huberman Lab podcast
where we discuss science and science-based tools
for everyday life.
[MUSIC PLAYING]
I'm Andrew Huberman, and I'm a professor
of neurobiology and ophthalmology
at Stanford School of Medicine.
Today is an Ask Me Anything episode or AMA.
This is part of our premium subscriber channel.
Our premium subscriber channel was started in order
to provide support for the standard Huberman Lab
podcast, which comes out every Monday
and is available at 0 cost to everybody
on all standard feeds, YouTube, Apple, Spotify and elsewhere.
We also started the premium channel as a way
to generate support for exciting research being
done at Stanford and elsewhere.
Research on human beings that leads
to important discoveries that assist
mental health, physical health, and performance.
I'm also pleased to inform you that for every dollar
of the Huberman Lab Premium channel
generates for research studies, the Tiny foundation has
agreed to match that amount.
So now we are able to double the total amount of funding
given to studies of mental health, physical health,
and human performance.
If you'd like to subscribe to the Huberman Lab podcast
Premium channel, please go to hubermanlab.com/premium.
It is $10 a month to subscribe, or you can pay $100 all at once
to get an entire 12-month subscription for a year.
We also have a lifetime subscription model
that is a one-time payment.
And again, you can find that option
at hubermanlab.com/premium.
For those of you that are already subscribers
to the premium channel, please go to hubermanlab.com/premium,
and download the premium subscription feed.
And for those of you that are not Huberman Lab podcast
premium subscribers, you can still
hear the first 20 minutes of today's episode,
and determine whether or not becoming a premium subscriber
is for you.
And now without further ado, I will answer your questions.
And as always, I will strive to be
as thorough as possible, as clear as possible,
and as concise as possible.
Our first question is about abstaining from thoughts.
And in answering this question, we're
going to skirt right up against a topic
that I've covered before on the podcast which
is obsessive compulsive disorder, which
is a very serious disorder.
I mean, it can have a range of severity,
but people with true OCD suffer a lot
from obsessions, these are intrusive thoughts,
and compulsions, which are the behaviors typically associated
with those thoughts.
I think it's really important that we define
OCD really clearly so that we can make sure
that we're talking about intrusive thoughts
and the desire to abstain from thoughts versus OCD
and where there might be some overlap there.
The functional definition of OCD that really pertains
to the disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder,
OCD as opposed to we call people neurotic,
or we say you have OCD, or I'm so
OCD about this, or OCD about that,
that's become a common use of the acronym OCD.
But true OCD is a situation in which
engaging in a particular compulsive behavior
does not serve to reduce the intensity or the frequency
of the obsessions.
In fact, it makes it worse.
So the typical thing that we hear these days
is oh, you're so OCD, or he's so OCD, or she's so OCD,
or I'm so OCD.
Now if someone is OCD in that sense, OK, so not
the clinical disorder but OCD in the sense
that they're really clean, they're really fastidious,
they need everything perfect.
However, that person can achieve some level of calm and comfort
that's fairly long lasting if everything's
clean and perfect, well, then that's not
obsessive compulsive disorder.
This is really important to understand
as we venture into answering the question
about intrusive thoughts and the desire
to abstain from certain thoughts.
A person with true OCD will keep cleaning and cleaning,
or washing their hands, or arranging things
at perfect right angles, but the more they
do it, the more their anxiety goes up.
A person who has more typical, gosh, we don't really even
have a language for this nowadays unfortunately,
but the sort of person that's extremely particular, they need
things a certain way, and they're very driven to resolve
things and do things to make sure that things are done
in a certain way, or handled in a certain way,
well, if that person can experience relief
from engaging in let's say, exercise, or from cleaning,
you'd say you're so OCD about exercise.
Well, but if exercising for an hour or even two hours
in the morning make somebody really calm the rest of the day
and they don't need to exercise well,
then they're not necessarily true OCD.
They don't necessarily have a disorder related to exercise.
However, if they're exercising for two hours in the morning
and then they find they can't concentrate
on other things and their desire to exercise just increases
and increases and becomes intrusive for them disrupting
their quality of life throughout the day,
well, then that's falling under the umbrella of what
we would call a true disorder.
So we want to highlight that because the question is
about a desire to abstain from thoughts,
and the question is, in your discussion
with Dr. Anna Lembke-- and I should just
mention Dr. Anna Lembke is the director of our Dual Diagnosis
Addiction Clinic at Stanford University School of Medicine.
She's the author of this incredible book Dopamine Nation
that I think everybody should read.
I do believe everyone should read that book.
So important for the addict and nonaddict
alike because it deals with basically the state of our life
nowadays.
We're living in this dopamine rich world
where we can quickly become dopamine depleted, which
is terrible, leads to depression in addition to things
like addiction in some folks, et cetera.
Anna was a guest on the podcast.
You can find her episode at hubermanlab.com.
Just put Anna.
I think she's the only guest we've
had thus far whose name is Anna, so it'll just pop up there.
The entire website is searchable.
But if you want to listen to that episode
or watch that episode, you can access it hubermanlab.com.
The question is in your discussion
with Dr. Anna Lembke you were talking about abstaining
from people's drug of choice for 30 days
to reset the dopamine reward pathway.
And indeed that is the prescriptive that Dr. Anna
Lembke gives for most all addictions
and for people that are suffering from milder even
severe depression related to dopamine
seeking behaviors, social media, video games, sex, food,
et cetera.
However, of course, in the instance of food
or in some other addictions, you can't abstain for 30 days.
That would be terrible to abstain for food for 30 days.
I'm sure people have done it, but it is not healthy to do.
Certain things like alcohol and drugs people
can abstain for 30 days in efforts
to never go back to them again.
There are cases of severe alcohol or opiate
dependence where people can't go cold turkey or they risk dying,
so there they need to really work with a physician.
But the 30-day reset of the dopamine system
is something that's very real and that
pertains to most people.
That is it's going to be very effective for most
people struggling with either behavioral,
or what are sometimes called process addictions,
or other types of addictions including substance abuse
issues.
The question continues.
You said you were going to ask Ana
how to abstain if your drug of choice
is a thought or narrative as opposed
to a substance or a behavior.
The question continues, as far as I can tell,
your discussion with Ana moved on
before you asked her the question.
Would you be able to discuss strategies
for abstaining from addictive thoughts and narratives?
OK.
So let's talk about intrusive thoughts,
and let's start off by asking ourselves, what is a thought?
In the realm of neurobiology, we have
sensations which are the processes by which our neurons,
nerve cells convert light, photons, sound waves, touch,
mechanical pressure, et cetera into electrical signals
and chemical signals that head into our nervous system,
including our brain.
And then our brain, at least we think, make sense of them,
and help us navigate the world that we're in.
So the sensation part is a pure transformation
of mechanical information, or in some cases,
chemical information like smell.
Literally, volatile chemicals floating around in the world
are brought in through your nose and your neurons
and your olfactory bulb convert those
into electrical and chemical signals
that your brain can understand.
Perceptions are your idea of what those signals out
in the world are.
Either because you're paying attention
to them, or for some other reason you decide
that stop sign in front of you is red,
and that the sign behind it is white,
and that the sky is blue or cloudy, those are perceptions.
So we have sensations and perceptions.
Then we have emotions which are these things that
include the mind and body that are related
to neuromodulators like dopamine, serotonin, et cetera,
although, those chemicals do other things as well.
And then, of course, we have behaviors, actions.
Everything from me moving my pen on a piece of paper
to walking, running, et cetera.
Thoughts are a fifth category of neural
functioning that we really need to define,
but that doesn't have as strict a definition
as sensations, perceptions, or feeling, or action.
But thoughts are real.
We all know this.
Thoughts are real, and one way that we can define thoughts
is that thoughts are perceptions that include data
from the past, present, or future, or combinations
of past and present, or present and future, or future and past.
I'm not trying to give an overly complicated definition here,
but if we are going to answer a question about how
to abstain from thoughts in a really
direct and actionable way, we really
need to address what our thoughts.
So thoughts are perceptions that are generated internally.
We don't need any external sensation
in order to have a thought.
We can close our eyes.
We could be in sensory isolation for that matter.
We could even be floating with no gravity,
and we can have a thought.
Thoughts tend to run pretty much automatically in the background
all the time.
Some people refer to this as chatter
in the back of our minds in a very unstructured way.
And then if we force our thoughts
to be structured because we decide they need to be,
or if something in our environment
captures our perception, then our thoughts
tend to be structured.
Let me give you an example.
If I'm just walking around, if there
were a way in which we could broadcast
my thoughts onto a screen, I hope we wouldn't do that.
But those thoughts would be a mixture
of semi-complete sentences and gibberish.
However if somebody stops me, and says, hi.
Good to see you.
What are you doing today?
And I start answering, well, then my thoughts
are suddenly being driven by an external stimulus,
their question, and some internal ideas, memory
of who I am and what I'm doing that day so
past and present, and so on.
And so thoughts become structured.
So when we have a question about how to abstain from thoughts,
we need to be additionally specific
and really pinpoint that what we're trying to do
is to abstain from thoughts we don't want presumably, either
because they are too repetitive and distracting,
or because what's contained in those thoughts is disturbing.
This is important because it gives us two answers
to the questions that are highly divergent.
One answer to the question of how
to abstain from intrusive thoughts, thoughts that
were addicted to, is if those thoughts are merely
on loop all the time and we can't stop them,
but the thoughts themselves aren't particularly disturbing.
So think about a song you can't get out of your head,
or you keep recounting some event,
but the event itself isn't very disturbing.
It's just intrusive because it's there.
Well, in that case, the data really
point to trying to anchor your thoughts
to some external stimulus.
So getting into action, getting into activities
that really draw your attention away from that thought.
Now you may still hear it scrolling in the background,
so you might be sitting in class still hearing that loop
of thoughts in the background.
That's something that over time ought to wane,
it ought to disappear if we try and bring
more and more attention to whatever it
is that's in our environment, whatever
it is that we happen to be learning or doing physically,
et cetera.
Things like mindful meditation.
Doing a 10 or even just 5 minute a day
practice of sitting with eyes closed,
or lying down with eyes closed and really focusing
on one's breath, focusing one's attention on sometimes
called the third eye center, but in science we'd
say just the region right behind the forehead,
you're directing your attention there,
has been shown to increase focus for singular topics
and can improve memory and do a bunch of other things as well.
Those are data from Dr. Wendy Suzuki's lab at New York
University.
She was a guest on the podcast as well.
My laboratory has run studies on mindful meditation as well.
So what you're really trying to do
is learn how to focus better on one thing,
and by focusing on that one thing,
you focus off these repetitive thoughts.
Now, I have a feeling that this question was asked
and that many people upvoted this question
because the issue isn't just thoughts that
are intrusive because they're there and on repeat,
but because the thoughts themselves are actually
troubling.
This could be recounting a trauma, someone harmed you,
you observed something that was disturbing, you felt wronged,
you felt someone else was wronged,
you can't seem to get your mind off of something,
and your emotions tend to follow,
and so it's uncomfortable.
I have a feeling this is the root of the question.
In that case, the approach is very different.
What we know from essentially all of the quality
scientific and clinical studies is
that those sorts of intrusive thoughts
are very much like a trauma.
Now we have to be clear in defining what trauma is.
I'll use the definition that Dr. Paul
Conti, another incredible guest that was on our podcast.
A Stanford-Harvard trained psychiatrist.
I think one of the world's foremost leaders
on the issue of trauma and psychiatry and psychology
generally.
He defines trauma as an event or something that fundamentally
changes the way that your nervous system works such
that you function less adaptively going forward
from that event.
So not every bad occurrence in your life is a trauma.
That's good news.
The bad news is many people have traumas,
and traumas change the way that our nervous system
works so that we don't function as well as we could.
So in that sense, intrusive thoughts that are disturbing
are in many ways traumas and are reinforcing that trauma.
Now, we know that almost counterintuitively
in order to deal with trauma, you
have to get very close to that trauma.
You don't have to reexpose, and I
would hope you would not reexpose yourself
to the very same trauma.
But we know that one of the best ways to deal with traumas
is to get very clear about the narrative around those traumas.
Now this can be done with a therapist ideally,
but not everyone has access to therapy or can afford therapy.
There's a range of quality of therapists for that matter,
so we're always referring to the desire for people
to do great therapy with really great,
meaning excellently trained people.
But it turns out that if you want to extinguish an intrusive
thought, one of the best ways to do that
is to journal about that particular thought extensively.
So rather than the earlier strategy for intrusive thoughts
where they're just on loop, and intrusive
because they're on loop and present,
but their content isn't disturbing,
when that thought is disturbing and intrusive,
we know that it's very useful to script out
as much detail about that particular thought
and the things around it as possible.
Now obviously, you want to do this in a way that
is fairly structured.
So you ideally would use complete sentences.
So the reason for doing that is that thoughts,
as I mentioned earlier, can often be fragmentary.
So they pop up in our mind almost
we seemingly spontaneously.
They're inhibiting our ability to focus,
or be present at work, or family, or other things,
or sleep.
Writing things down in a lot of detail
does seem to have this quality of both reducing
the emotional load of whatever it is that thought is about,
as well as diminishing the frequency of those intrusive
thoughts over time.
So this is far and away different than the strategy
I mentioned for the other types of intrusive thoughts.
And really it's far and away different
from the 30-day abstinence approach
that Dr. Anna Lembke was talking about for substance
or behavioral addictions.
Now, of course, this process of abstaining from thoughts
or removing the addictive nature of certain thoughts
can definitely take some time.
So a good example there would be superstitions.
I'll come clean here, and I've talked
about this before on a few podcasts
that when I was in college, I developed
a knock on wood superstition.
Any time I'd say something that I didn't want to happen or did
want to happen, I'd say, knock on wood, and I'd knock on wood.
And then I started suppressing the behavior mostly
because it was a little embarrassing.
And then I started just telling myself in my head,
knock on wood, knock on wood, knock on wood.
And it was clearly a little bit of an OCD type thing,
but again, OCD in air quotes here.
I think it qualified as OCD in the sense
that the more I did it, the more I wanted to do it.
So I needed to go cold turkey on the thinking,
but how can you go cold turkey on a thought?
You couldn't.
What I was told to do and what worked very well for me
was to just write down the worst possible outcome
that I was concerned about.
So to really get close to the nature or the underlying basis
of that intrusive thought.
And I raise this because a lot of times
the intrusive thought is not, OK, I'm
thinking about a car accident, or I'm
thinking about a breakup, or I'm thinking about an exam
that I have.
That can be intrusive, but a lot of times
it's some kind of nebulous, abstract,
set of words, or ideas, or images around something
that happened that we saw or heard or experienced.
And by putting a lot of clear structure
to what the thought is exactly and to putting some thought
and structure onto paper about what that pattern of not
healthy thinking relates to, people often
achieve tremendous relief in a fairly short amount of time.
Sometimes just in one session of writing it down,
sometimes they need to write it down multiple times.
What you're essentially trying to do with a intrusive thought
or a trauma of any kind is you're
trying to turn a disturbing story, that is a story that
evokes a lot of emotion and captures,
it hijacks your nervous system, into what is essentially
a known but repetitive and old, boring story
where the emotional load has been depleted.
And there are, of course, I have to highlight the fact
that getting sufficient rapid eye movement sleep we also know
is very important for removing the emotional load
of traumatic experiences and intrusive thoughts.
So you really want to strive to get the best possible sleep you
can.
That includes sufficient rapid eye movement sleep.
And we have multiple zero-cost resources
for that at hubermanlab.com.
We have the episode on mastery or sleep.
We have the episode on perfecting your sleep.
We have the toolkit for sleep.
All of which are time stamped and all of which
can be accessed to completely zero cost to try and get
your sleep as good as possible, including lots
of rapid eye movement sleep.
So in order to remove intrusive and addictive thoughts,
ask yourself, is this OCD of the classic sense?
If it is, you should see a psychiatrist.
They won't necessarily prescribe medication,
but there are tools for true OCD that are
very effective in many cases.
And we did the episode on OCD which I invite
you to listen to as well.
You want to ask yourself, are the thoughts
disturbing or merely intrusive and repetitive?
If they're merely intrusive and repetitive, well,
then learning to focus your attention on other things
and getting better at focusing on single things
through an exercise like mindfulness,
meditation can really help.
And indeed perhaps the best use of mindfulness meditation
is to improve your level of focus.
It does have other benefits as well,
but that's going to be the major one that one will experience
even with these very short 5 or 10-minute day meditations.
Great data on that from the scientific literature.
And then if those intrusive thoughts are not only intrusive
but they're also disturbing, in that case,
you really want to put as much structure and thought,
believe it or not, into what those thoughts are
really about.
Write them out on paper in complete sentences
and maybe do that multiple times until the underlying
emotions related to those thoughts
really start to diminish.
And by doing that, you're essentially
doing your own form of trauma therapy,
for lack of a better way to put it.
And again, the data really point to the fact
that getting close to the specific details
around those intrusive thoughts is
going to be the best way to extinguish them.
Thank you for joining for the beginning
of this Ask Me Anything episode.
To hear the full episode and to hear future episodes of these
Ask Me Anything sessions, plus to receive transcripts of them
and transcripts of the Huberman Lab podcast standard channel
and premium tools not released anywhere else,
please go to hubermanlabs.com/premium
Just to remind you why we launched the Huberman Lab
podcast Premium channel it's really twofold.
First of all, it's to raise support
for the standard Huberman Lab podcast channel which,
of course, will still be continued to be released
every Monday in full length.
We are not going to change the format
or anything about the standard Huberman Lab podcast.
And to fund research, in particular research done
on human beings.
So not animal models but on human beings,
which I think we all agree is the species
that we are most interested in.
And we are going to specifically fund
research that is aimed toward developing
further protocols for mental health, physical health,
and performance.
And those protocols will be distributed
through all channels.
Not just the premium channel but through all channels,
Huberman Lab podcast and other media channels.
So the idea here is to give you information to your burning
questions in depth, and allow you the opportunity
to support the research that provides those kinds of answers
in the first place.
Now an especially exciting feature of the premium channel
is that the Tiny Foundation has generously
offered to do a dollar-for-dollar match
on all funds raised for research through the premium channel.
So this is a terrific way that they're
going to amplify whatever funds come in through the premium
channel to further support research for science
and science-related tools for mental health, physical health,
and performance.
If you'd like to sign up for the Huberman Lab Premium channel,
again there's a cost of $10 per month,
or you can pay $100 up front for the entire year.
That will give you access to all the AMAs,
you can ask questions and get answers to your questions,
and you'll, of course, get answers to all the questions
that other people ask as well.
There will also be some premium content such as transcripts
of the AMAs and various transcripts and protocols
of Huberman Lab podcast episodes not found elsewhere.
And again, you'll be supporting research
for mental health, physical health, and performance.
You can sign up for the premium channel by going
to hubermanlab.com/premium.
Again, that's hubermanlab.com/premium.
And as always, thank you for your interest in science.
[MUSIC PLAYING]